Connect with us

General Literature

Analysis of Julius Caesar by William shakespeare

Published

on

Analysis of julius caesar by william shakespeare

Summary Of Julius Caesar by William shakespeare

The action begins in February 44 BC. Julius Caesar had just reentered Rome in triumph after a victory in Spain over the sons of his old enemy, Pompey the Great. A spontaneous celebration had begun and had been broken up by Flavius and Marullus, two political enemies of Caesar. It soon becomes apparent from their words that powerful and secret forces are working against Caesar.
Caesar appears, attended by a train of friends and supporters, and is warned by a soothsayer to “beware the ides of March,” but he ignores the warning and leaves for the games and races marking the celebration of the feast of Lupercal.
After Caesar’s departure, only two men waited behind — Marcus Brutus, a close personal friend of Caesar, and Cassius, a long time political foe of Caesar’s. Both men are of aristocratic origin and see the end of their ancient privilege in Caesar’s political reforms and conquests. Envious of Caesar’s power and prestige, Cassius cleverly probes to discover where Brutus’ deepest sympathies lie.

As a man of highest personal integrity, Brutus opposes Caesar on principle, despite his friendship with him. Cassius cautiously inquires about Brutus’ feelings if a conspiracy were to unseat Caesar; he finds Brutus not altogether against the notion; that is, Brutus shares “some aim” with Cassius but does not wish “to be any further moved.” The two men part, promising to meet again for further discussions.
In the next scene, it is revealed that the conspiracy Cassius spoke of in veiled terms is already a reality.

He has gathered together a group of disgruntled and discredited aristocrats who are only too willing to assassinate Caesar. Partly to gain the support of the respectable element of Roman society, Cassius persuades Brutus to head the conspiracy, and Brutus agrees to do so. Shortly afterwards, plans are made at a secret meeting in Brutus’ orchard. The date is set: It will be on the day known as the ides of March, the fifteenth day of the month. Caesar is to be murdered in the Senate chambers by the concealed daggers and swords of the assembled conspirators.
After the meeting is ended, Brutus’ wife, Portia, suspecting something and fearing for her husband’s safety, questions him. Touched by her love and devotion, Brutus promises to reveal his secret to her later.
The next scene takes place in Caesar’s house. The time is the early morning; the date, the fateful ides of March. The preceding night has been a strange one — wild, stormy, and full of strange and unexplainable sights and happenings throughout the city of Rome. Caesar’s wife, Calphurnia, terrified by horrible nightmares, persuades Caesar not to go to the Capitol, convinced that her dreams are portents of disaster. By prearrangement, Brutus and the other conspirators arrive to accompany Caesar, hoping to fend off any possible warnings until they have him totally in their power at the Senate. Unaware that he is surrounded by assassins and shrugging off Calphurnia’s exhortations, Caesar goes with them.
Despite the conspirators’ best efforts, a warning is pressed into Caesar’s hand on the very steps of the Capitol, but he refuses to read it. Wasting no further time, the conspirators move into action. Purposely asking Caesar for a favor they know he will refuse, they move closer, as if begging a favor, and then, reaching for their hidden weapons, they kill him before the shocked eyes of the senators and spectators.

Hearing of Caesar’s murder, Mark Antony, Caesar’s closest friend, begs permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus grants this permission over the objections of Cassius and delivers his own speech first, confident that his words will convince the populace of the necessity for Caesar’s death. After Brutus leaves, Antony begins to speak. The crowd has been swayed by Brutus’ words, and it is an unsympathetic crowd that Antony addresses.

Using every oratorical device known, however, Antony turns the audience into a howling mob, screaming for the blood of Caesar’s murderers. Alarmed by the furor caused by Antony’s speech, the conspirators and their supporters are forced to flee from Rome and finally, from Italy.

At this point, Antony, together with Caesar’s young grandnephew and adopted son, Octavius, and a wealthy banker, Lepidus, gathers an army to pursue and destroy Caesar’s killers. These three men, known as triumvirs, have formed a group called the Second Triumvirate to pursue the common goal of gaining control of the Roman Empire.

Months pass, during which the conspirators and their armies are tracked relentlessly into the far reaches of Asia Minor. When finally they decide to stop at the town of Sardis, Cassius and Brutus quarrel bitterly over finances. Their differences are resolved, however, and plans are made to meet the forces of Antony, Octavius, and Lepidus in one final battle.

Against his own better judgment, Cassius allows Brutus to overrule him: Instead of holding to their well-prepared defensive positions, Brutus orders an attack on Antony’s camp on the plains of Philippi. Just before the battle, Brutus is visited by the ghost of Caesar. “I shall see thee at Philippi,” the spirit warns him, but Brutus’ courage is unshaken and he goes on.

The battle rages hotly. At first, the conspirators appear to have the advantage, but in the confusion, Cassius is mistakenly convinced that all is lost, and he kills himself. Leaderless, his forces are quickly defeated, and Brutus finds himself fighting a hopeless battle. Unable to face the prospect of humiliation and shame as a captive (who would be chained to the wheels of Antony’s chariot and dragged through the streets of Rome), he too takes his own life.
As the play ends, Antony delivers a eulogy over Brutus’ body, calling him “the noblest Roman of them all.” Caesar’s murder has been avenged, order has been restored, and, most important, the Roman Empire has been preserved.

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF  PERSUASION

Persuasion is a concept at the centre of this play. Everyone seems to be trying to convince someone else of something: Caesar tries to build an image in the public’s mind of his crowing (an ancient form of spin doctoring); Cassius finds the best way to manipulate each man he seeks to bring to his side; and Brutus, whom the reader hopes will refuse to engage, takes longer than the others to respond to Cassius’ manipulations, but eventually does respond and even finishes the job for him by persuading himself (see his soliloquy in Act II, Scene I). This pivotal scene, when Brutus joins the conspirators, is also interesting because Portia, Brutus’ wife, serves as the voice of Brutus’ conscience.

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF FATE VERSUS FREE WILL

Julius Caesar raises many questions about the force of fate in life versus the capacity for free will. Cassius refuses to accept Caesar’s rising power and deems a belief in fate to be nothing more than a form of passivity or cowardice. He says to Brutus : “Men at sometime were masters of their fates. / The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, / But in ourselves, that we are underlings” (I.ii. 140– 142).

Cassius urges a return to a more noble, self-possessed attitude toward life, blaming his and Brutus’s submissive stance not on a predestined plan but on their failure to assert themselves. Ultimately, the play seems to support a philosophy in which fate and freedom maintain a delicate coexistence. Thus Caesar declares: “It seems to me most strange that men should fear, / Seeing that death, a necessary end, / Will come when it will come” (II.ii. 35– 37).

In other words, Caesar recognizes that certain events lie beyond human control; to crouch in fear of them is to enter a paralysis equal to, if not worse than, death. It is to surrender any capacity for freedom and agency that one might actually possess. Indeed, perhaps to face death head-on, to die bravely and honourably, is Caesar’s best course: in the end, Brutus interprets his and Cassius’s defeat as the work of Caesar’s ghost— not just his apparition, but also the force of the people’s devotion to him, the strong legacy of a man who refused any fear of fate and, in his disregard of fate, seems to have transcended it.

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF  LEADERSHIP

Shakespeare took the potential for upheaval in Julius Caesar and used it to examine a leadership theme.bConcentrating on the responsibilities of the ruling class, he looked at what could happen if that class no longer had a unified vision and hand lost sight of what it meant to be Roman.

In fact, the characters of the play lose touch with the tradition, glory, integrity, and stoicism of their past. As you read the play, note the way that Cassius use the memory of that glorious past to persuade men to become conspirators, and the way the actions of the conspirators do or do not return Rome to its golden age.

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF PUBLIC SELF VERSUS PRIVATE SELF

Much of the play’s tragedy stems from the characters’ neglect of private feelings and loyalties in favor of what they believe to be the public good.
Similarly, characters confuse their private selves with their public selves, hardening and dehumanizing
themselves or transforming themselves into ruthless political machines.

Brutus rebuffs his wife, Portia when she pleads with him to confide in her; believing himself to be acting on the people’s will, he forges ahead with the murder of Caesar, despite their close friendship. Brutus puts aside his personal loyalties and shuns thoughts of Caesar the man, his friend; instead, he acts on what he believes to be the public’s wishes and kills Caesar the leader, the imminent dictator.

Cassius can be seen as a man who has gone to the extreme in cultivating his public persona. Caesar, describing his distrust of Cassius, tells Antony that the problem with Cassius is his lack of a private life—his seeming refusal to acknowledge his own sensibilities or to nurture his own spirit. Such a man, Caesar fears, will let nothing hinder with his ambition. Indeed, Cassius lacks all sense of personal honour and shows himself to be a ruthless schemer. Ultimately, neglecting private sentiments to follow public concerns brings Caesar to his death. Although Caesar does briefly agree to stay home from the Senate in order to please Calpurnia, who has dreamed of his murder, he gives way to ambition when Decius tells him that the senators plan to offer him the crown. -Caesar’s public self again takes precedence.

Sadly, he no longer sees the difference between his omnipotent, immortal public image and his
vulnerable human body. Just preceding his death, Caesar refuses Artemidorus’s pleas to speak with
him, saying that he gives last priority to his most personal interests. He thus endangers himself by believing that the strength of his public self will
defend his private self.

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF
POWER

When it seems evident to the conspirators in Shakespeare’s play that Julius Caesar is headed for absolute power, he becomes a threat to the ideals and values of the Roman Republic.bThey assassinate Caesar before he can be crowned king. The irony is that Caesar’s death results in civil war. As two factions with questionable motives grab for power, chaos ensues and the Republic is never the same again.

See what happens when you don’t plan ahead? By dramatizing the historical circumstances surrounding Caesar’s assassination, Shakespeare asks a set of questions relevant to his 16th-century audience and readers today: How should cities and countries be governed? What makes a good leader? What happens when a political leader’s power is unchecked? What happens when the leader dies without a suitable replacement lined up? And who really did let the dogs out?

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF MISINTERPRETATIONS AND MISREADINGS

Much of the play deals with the characters’ failures to interpret correctly the omens that they encounter. As Cicero says, “Men may construe things after their fashion, / Clean from the purpose of the things themselves” (I.iii. 34– 35). Thus, the night preceding Caesar’s appearance at the Senate is full of portents, but no one reads them accurately: Cassius takes them to signify the danger that Caesar’s impending coronation would bring to the state, when, if anything, they warn of the destruction that Cassius himself threatens.

There are calculated misreadings as well: Cassius manipulates Brutus into joining the conspiracy by means of forged letters, knowing that Brutus’s trusting nature will cause him to accept the letters as authentic pleas from the Roman people.

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF
FATE AND FREE WILL

Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings. (1.2.138-140) That’s what Cassius says to Brutus as the two contemplate removing Caesar from power. Although Cassius claims that men are “masters of their fates” as a way to motivate the conspirators to action against Caesar, there’s a lot of evidence to suggest he’s wrong.

The play is full of omens and prophesies that come true, which undermines the sense that characters can exercise free will and shape the outcomes of their lives. We should also keep in mind that Julius Caesar dramatizes historical events that have, by definition, already happened. As characters struggle with questions of fate vs. free will, the audience already knows what their futures hold. This tends to create a lot of dramatic irony.

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF INFLEXIBILITY VERSUS COMPROMISE

Both Brutus and Caesar are stubborn, rather inflexible people who ultimately suffer fatally for it. In the play’s aggressive political landscape, individuals succeed through adaptability, bargaining, and compromise. Brutus’s rigid though honourable ideals leave him open for manipulation by Cassius. He believes so thoroughly in the purpose of the assassination that he does not perceive the need for excessive political manoeuvring to justify the murder.

Equally resolute, Caesar prides himself on his steadfastness; yet this constancy helps bring about his death, as he refuses to heed ill omens and goes willingly to the  Senate, into the hands of his murderers. Antony proves perhaps the most adaptable of all of the politicians: while his speech to the Roman citizen’s centres on Caesar’s generosity toward each citizen, he later searches for ways to turn these funds into cash in order to raise an army against Brutus and Cassius.

Although he gains power by offering to honour Caesar’s will and provide the citizens their rightful money, it becomes clear that ethical concerns will not prevent him from using the funds in a more politically expedient manner. Antony is a successful politician—yet the question of morality remains. There seems to be no way to reconcile firm moral principles with success in politics in Shakespeare’s rendition of ancient Rome; thus each character struggles toward a different solution.

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF FRIENDSHIP

Like ostriches and Lake Titicaca,
Men in the play must to choose between loyalty to their friends and loyalty to the Roman Republic, which leads to some of the most famous examples of manipulation and violent disloyalty in Western literature. This is especially true for Brutus, who chooses to join the conspirators’ assassination plot when it seems clear to him that his BFF, Julius Caesar, is headed for absolute power. Wow Brutus, not cool.

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF DEFINING MASCULINITY

While gender itself is not a central point to this play, questions of Masculinity and effeminacy are. Caesar’s weakness — his effeminacy — makes him vulnerable. On the other hand, the incorporation of the so-called feminine traits of compassion and love into the friendship between Brutus and Cassius paradoxically allows the men to show greater strength and allows the audience to have greater sympathy for them.

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF
ART AND CULTURE

Hold onto your people—we’re about to get meta in here. Just about all of Shakespeare’s works contain self-referential, or “metatheatrical” moments, but in Julius Caesar Shakespeare takes it to the next level by forging a relationship between the theatre and politics. In the play, politicians know they’re like actors performing on a very public stage, and they measure their speeches and actions accordingly.

At other times, characters even seem aware that their historical actions will be dramatized over a thousand years later on the Elizabethan stage. What are they, psychic or something? The play is also full of self-conscious references to the kinds of public and political roles that poets (like Shakespeare) can play in the world.

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF
MANIPULATION

In Julius Caesar, manipulation is almost a professional sport. Politicians use their rhetorical skills to gain power and to influence large, fickle crowds, and seeming friends lie outright to each other. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also highlight the willingness of individuals in hard times to hear what they want to hear (remind you at all of our own day and age?).

It’s often unclear whether characters are manipulated by others, or do they simply find in the speech of others an inspiration to do what they might otherwise have been too afraid to do.

JULIUS CAESAR THEME OF
PRIDE

When it comes to pride, Julius Caesar takes the gold.
He’s the most outwardly arrogant—and considering some of the other characters we’re introduced to, that’s saying a lot. Caesar’s total lack of humility seems to be his tragic flaw. His prideful arrogance is a blinding force that prevents him from seeing the harm he’s doing and the harm being planned against him. When Brutus is humble about what others call his greatness, he sets himself up in sympathetic contrast to Caesar. We like Brutus because he isn’t all He also seems wiser than Caesar for being more aware of the world around him and genuinely more concerned for it.

  Motifs

OMENS AND PORTENTS

Throughout the play, omens and portents manifest themselves, each serving to crystallize the larger themes of fate and misinterpretation of signs. Until Caesar’s death, each time an omen or nightmare is reported, the audience is reminded of Caesar’s
impending demise. The audience wonders whether these portents simply announce what is fated to
occur or whether they serve as warnings for what might occur if the characters do not take active steps
to change their behaviour. Whether or not individuals can affect their destinies, characters repeatedly fail to
interpret the omens correctly. In a larger sense, the omens in Julius Caesar thus imply the dangers of failing to perceive and analyze the details of one’s world.

LETTERS

The motif of letters represents an interesting counterpart to the force of oral rhetoric in the play. Oral rhetoric depends upon a direct, dialogic interaction between speaker and audience: depending on how the listeners respond to a certain statement, the orator can alter his or her speech and intonations accordingly. In contrast, the power of a written letter depends more fully on the addressee; whereas an orator must read the emotions of the crowd, the act of reading is undertaken solely by the recipient of the letter.

Thus, when Brutus receives the forged letter
from Cassius in Act II, scene I, the letter has an effect because Brutus allows it to do so; it is he who grants
it its full power. In contrast, Caesar refuses to read the letter that Artemidorus tries to hand him in Act III,
scene i, as he is heading to the Senate. Predisposed to ignore personal affairs, Caesar denies the letter any reading at all and thus negates the potential power of the words written inside.

  Symbols

Symbols are objects, characters, figures, or colors used to represent abstract ideas or concepts.

WOMEN AND WIVES

While one could try to analyze Calpurnia and Portia as full characters in their own right, they function primarily not as sympathetic personalities or sources of insight or poetry but rather as symbols for the
private, domestic realm. Both women plead with their husbands to be more aware of their private needs and
feelings (Portia in Act II, scene i Calpurnia in Act III, scene ii).

Caesar and Brutus rebuff the pleas of their respective wives, however; they not only prioritize public matters but also actively disregard their private emotions and intuitions. As such, Calpurnia and Portia are powerless figures, willing though unable to help and comfort Caesar and Brutus.

Poets and Teachers

These purveyors of words aren’t central to any of the play’s action, but they do stand out because of how widely they’re disregarded, even when they have important things to say. While Shakespeare’s work was considered important enough to get him royal patronage from King James I, poetry during Caesar’s time was decidedly different. The most important pieces of literature from that time, whether poetic or not, focus on history and tradition. Livy’s History of Rome, Caesar’s own Gallic Wars, Tacitus’ Histories, and Virgil’s Aeneid had history at their core. The idea of writing for writing’s sake wasn’t popular.

Within that context, the presentation of the men of letters in Julius Caesar makes a little more sense. The first and only person who can explicitly warn Caesar in detail of the plot to kill him is a teacher of rhetoric, Artemidorius. Caught up in his affairs of state, Caesar ignores this learned man’s teaching, which costs him his life.
Next we see Cinna the poet torn to shreds for having the wrong name. Even after the mob realizes he’s not that Cinna, they kill him anyway as punishment for his “bad verses.” (That the mob is ignorant enough to be this blood-lusty casts some doubt on whether they’re qualified to be literary critics.)

The final poet we meet shows up outside Brutus and Cassius’ tent after their quarrel. He asks them to love each other as brothers and suggests that they shouldn’t be alone together. (Probably a good idea, considering that they almost killed each other.) The poet points out that he has lived longer than they have and might have something to teach them. They just laugh at him, threaten him, and finally dismiss him.
In all three instances, men of words seem pretty randomly inserted into the play. There’s no real reason to have a scene solely devoted to killing Cinna, or for the strange little exchange with the poet at the end. None of those instances move the plot along.

Omens

Julius Caesar is full of cryptic omens: the soothsayer’s advice for Caesar to “beware the Ides of March,” bad weather, wacky animal behavior, scary dreams, and, of course, ghosts. We talk about each of these omens in more detail below but here are two overall points we want to make, so pay attention…or else something terrible might happen.
Point 1: Just about every omen in the play is subject to interpretation.

(Kind of like all of Shakespeare’s plays are subject to interpretation. And yes, we are most definitely drawing a parallel between how characters (mis)interpret omens and the way we perform literary analysis.) Take, for example, Calphurnia’s dream about a bunch of Romans standing around washing their hands in Caesar’s blood (2.2). Calphurnia correctly guesses that this is a bad thing but Decius convinces Caesar that the dream means he will be Rome’s savior. Of course, it turns out Calphurnia was right, but nobody believes her (partly because she’s a woman), so Caesar ends up getting stabbed 33 times.

The play is full of people running around misinterpreting omens.
Point 2: You’ve probably already figured out what our second point is, but we’ll say it anyway: the true meanings of the play’s omens tend to be lost on most of the characters until it’s too late to do anything about them. So does this mean we should talk about how dumb Caesar is to overlook Calphurnia’s scary dream or the soothsayer’s advice to “beware the Ides of March”? Should we criticize Cassius for failing to anticipate his own doom? Not necessarily.
As students of history and literature, we have an edge over the play’s characters.

First, we know how things will end in the play, because Shakespeare is writing about historical events. Second, it’s pretty easy for us as readers to recognize a bad omen when we see one. In literature, lousy weather pretty much always signals that something bad is going to happen, right?
The Ides of March
Historically and in Shakespeare’s play, the “Ides of March” refers to March 15, the day Julius Caesar was assassinated by the Roman conspirators. The term first appears in Julius Caesar when a soothsayer approaches Caesar and cryptically warns him (twice) to “beware the Ides of March” (1.2.21), which Caesar arrogantly dismisses as the meaningless ranting of a silly “dreamer” (1.2.29).

“Ides of March” is repeated no fewer than seven times in the play, which serves as an ominous reminder of Caesar’s impending doom.
The soothsayer’s warning raises an interesting question about the relationship between fate and free will, an important theme we discuss at length in this learning guide: if Caesar had actually heeded the warning to “beware the Ides of March,” could he have changed the course of his future?

Weather

This one’s kind of a no-brainer. As in most of Shakespeare’s tragedies, here’s the rule: where there’s lightning and thunder, bad stuff happens. (Just read Macbeth if you don’t believe us.) On the night Cassius and the conspirators are plotting to murder Caesar, thunder and lightning shake the streets like no one has ever seen. Casca interprets the weather as an omen of bad things to come: “Either there is a civil strife in heaven, / or else the world, too saucy with the gods, / Incenses them to send destruction” (1.3.11-13).

Hmm, that pretty much alerts us to the fact that the conspirators’ plot against Caesar will cause a big old civil war, don’t you think? But Cassius thinks the bad weather and other signs are a “warning” to the Romans about Caesar’s “monstrous state” of tyranny in Rome (1.3.73; 74). The important thing here is that you can interpret omens in different ways depending on what you want them to mean.

Animals

Every time there are bad omens in the play, animals, especially birds, center prominently.
When Casca talks about how fearsome the night that Cassius gathers the plotters is, there’s thunder and lighting, but there’s also the strange occurrence of a nocturnal bird showing up at the marketplace at high noon, shrieking doom.
Calphurnia warns Caesar not to go to the Capitol because she’s seen a war in the air, the domain of the birds.

Finally, when Cassius accepts that he has to die in the battle against Antony and Octavius, he knows it because two great eagles that fed from the hands of soldiers were replaced the next day by ravens, crows, and kites – dark birds that filled the air with shrieking and spread a shadow of death over the army. Cassius knows the eagles feeding on soldier’s hands symbolize him and Brutus, two noblemen whose fates rest with their armies. After the eagles fall, the black army of Antony and Octavius will spread the shadow of tyranny over the land, like those scavenger birds.

Other animals show up on occasion, such as the lions both Calphurnia and Casca see in visions. Calphurnia envisions a lioness giving birth in the streets, a strange location for this to take place. The lion that Casca saw walked by him sulkily without attacking. So the lion (king of the jungle) acts unnaturally in the play, perhaps symbolizing the fact that Caesar, who could become king (of men) will not reach this status.
Just to beat us over the head with the symbolism, Cassius refers to Caesar as “the lion in the Capitol” when he talks about the need to overthrow him. And when Caesar claims he’s more dangerous than danger itself, he says: “We are two lions littered in one day, And I the elder and more terrible.” By identifying himself with such a powerful and fearsome animal, Caesar forces the “hinds” (deer) of Rome to gang up against him.

Finally, as far as animals go, there’s also the unknown beast that Caesar has sacrificed, whose lack of a heart is definitely a bad omen. Again, Shakespeare reminds us that omens can be interpreted in many ways. Caesar takes it to mean that if he doesn’t go to the Capitol that day he is a coward. Caesar borrows here from the Latin word for “heart” (“cor”), from which we get the word “courage,” since the heart was thought to be the source of that particular passion. Of course, we readers know that the omen might better be interpreted as a sign that the conspirators don’t have hearts or mercy when they agree to take Caesar’s life..

Ghosts

Ghosts appear a few times in the play and are obvious symbols for bad news. On the fateful night before the Ides of March, Casca meets terrified women who claim the streets are filled with men in flames – visions no one else can see. Brutus is visited twice by a ghost, which he believes to be the ghost of Caesar. Obviously, this can’t be good – you don’t come all the way out of the grave to deliver a casual “howdy.”

Setting of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

Where It All Goes Down Rome, around 45 B.C. The play takes place in ancient Rome, just after Julius Caesar has defeated Pompey and his sons and returned to Rome in triumph. (FYI – Pompey was a former co-ruler in the first Roman triumvirate or rule of three
men.) Though it’s not in the play Caesar’s power is growing. He’s been elected Consul (the highest office of the Roman Republic) for life, giving him unprecedented power. Though a lot of the actual events are crunched together for Shakespeare’s literary purposes, the general feeling is that it’s a time when Romans are happy to be recovering from the civil war – so happy that they don’t worry that the Republic is in danger of becoming an empire led by one king instead of elected representatives.
To give you a little context, Caesar was actually assassinated on March 15, 44 B.C., and Antony’s alliance with Octavius in the second triumvirate came to an end eleven years later, in 33 B.C., when a disagreement turned into a war. Power politics were beginning to become the norm in Rome, and Rome’s honour and tradition as a republic hung in the balance.

Tone of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

Take a story’s temperature by studying its tone. Is it hopeful? Cynical? Snarky? Playful? Serious, Calm, Rational, Earnest Though the play opens with a little joke, the subject matter of the play remains serious throughout. The characters are never indulgent about their own gain. Rather, they speak constantly in the of what’s best for Rome.

All decisions are thought of calmly, executed calmly, and the consequences are faced with calm nobility that can at times be unnerving. (Like when Brutus calmly makes battle plans even though his wife has just died. He doesn’t do this
because he doesn’t love her, but because he’s bearing his burden as a stoic Roman.) Even though the characters don’t give the passionate, melodramatic speeches that are the staples of other plays, their calmness translates into an air of dignified nobility, which seeps into the play and makes the characters, if not likeable, then at least admirable folks.

Style of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

At the beginning of our studies of the play Julius Caesar, we were asked to brainstorm why we thought Shakespeare’s plays are still studied today. Our class decided on many fair reasons, such as:
They explore human nature.
Concepts are relevant to prevent future conflicts.
Allows us to realise the mistakes people have made in the past through text.
However, after reading the play, I’m mostly convinced that the true reason is because of his powerful and vivid writing style, which I truly remembered the most. Although it was confusing at times, as his writing is unlike anything I’ve read before, once I understood a section, it became quite interesting and exciting to comprehend such intelligent ideas.
Throughout our reading, we noticed something fascinating about the way people spoke depending on their social class, which I thought was rather clever. The nobles spoke in iambic pentameter, or blank verse, while the Commoners spoke in prose.

Iambic pentameter or black verse is where there are ten syllables in each line, of which five are stressed and the remaining are unstressed. The first line of Antony’s famous speech (III, ii, 75-109) is “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears.” You may notice that this line sounds much like a poem. That’s because of the way it’s written, in iambic pentameter. On the other hand,
Prose is just the way you and I talk – in no special rhythm or pattern. When the First Citizen reacts to Antony’s speech, he says, “Me thinks there is much reason in his sayings,” which seems like ordinary and normal speech. The effect of iambic pentameter and prose does differentiate the nobles from the commoners, and it also allows us to notice when a character falls. For example, in Brutus’ speech before Mark Antony’s:
“Romans, countrymen, and lovers! Hear me for my cause,
and be silent, that you may hear: believe me for mine…” (III, ii, 15-17)
His fall has begun so Brutus wasn’t given the dignity of poetry; while prior to this, he often spoke in poetry.
Shakespeare uses images and descriptions to help influence the audience. When Cassius describes Caesar in I, ii, 135-138, Cassius says:
“Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world
Like a Colossus, and we petty men
Walk under his huge legs and peep about
To find ourselves dishonourable graves”
These lines show Cassius’ thoughts on how Caesar is so honourable and good, while the other petty men just follow his orders and look forward to dying dishonourably as slaves, and as Caesar becomes more important, the importance of the other nobles diminishes. Besides this, you may have recognised the powerful imagery in these lines. The strong images, firstly allows the viewer to understand the context visually, and then affects how the audience perceives Caesar as a character, especially when it says how he powerfully dominates the entire “narrow world” and how the petty men have no position in this world.
The play Julius Caesar is loaded with figurative language, especially metaphors to enrich the language of his play, which makes it even more relevant and valuable to study today. Although this was probably the dominating factor of why I found it difficult to understand the context sometimes, most phrases do deserve the credit they’re given just by us studying them. For example, when Caesar states to Anthony:

“Let me have men about me that are fat,
Sleek-headed men, and such sleep o’-nights:
Young Cassius has a lean and hungry look;
He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.”
Here, Caesar suspects that Cassius might do something against him so he should be fed well to not envy the power that Caesar has. Shakespeare compares Cassius to a wolf because his is physical appearance denotes his dangerous and shifty nature.
Furthermore, similes are often used too in Julius Caesar, as in Caesars line:
“But I am constant as the northern star” (III, i, 60)
Caesar explains that he doesn’t change his mind on things when they request to banish Cimber, after defining the three omens, warning him that his life will soon be in danger if he goes to the Senate on the Ides of March. This line shows his excessive pride and self-importance, which only increases by the following lines:
“Of whose true-fix’d and resting quality
There is no fellow in the firmament.” (III, i, 61-62)
And then:
“Hence! Wilt though lift up Olympus?” (III, i, 73)
This line is a metaphor, where he, annoyed, states that he is as steady as Olympus, a mountain in Greece home to the gods, and therefore immovable. It is also an example of irony as he says it at the edge of dying, when he compares himself to an immortal God before the conspirators kill him. This refers to his excessive ego when he compares himself to the brightest star of all.
And finally:
“Et tu, Brute! Then fall, Caesar!”
These are the last words of the Roman dictator Julius Caesar. “Et tu Brute!” translates to “And you, Brutus!” The famous line, uttered by Caesar when he spots his best friend, Brutus, among the conspirators, signifies the betrayal by a friend. Caesar thought of Brutus as the last person to betray him, so he has no one left to trust. He’d rather fall than live to see his best friend stab him, which again, shows his self-importance.

Thus, I continue to believe that Shakespeare’s unique, clever writing style is the reason why we still study his plays today. Many quotes from popular movies arise from Shakespeare’s phrases. They are still so relevant in society today and with the added powerful language, they are even more valuable. Through techniques, like iambic pentameter, prose and figurative language, the viewer is able to read between the lines and realise that the way he wrote each, single word is deliberate and has a reason – a valuable one too.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

General Literature

Word Stress Rules In English

Published

on

By

Word stress rules in english
Word stress rules in english

Word stress rules in english

What is Word Stress?

In English, We do not state each syllable with the same intensity or consistency. In a single word, we focus more on ONE syllable. We state one syllable noisily (enormous, solid, significant) and the various syllables unobtrusively.

How about we take 3 words: photo, picture taker and photographic. Do they sound similar when spoken? No. Since we emphasize (stress) ONE syllable in each word. Furthermore, it isn’t generally a similar syllable. So the “shape” of each word is extraordinary.

This post is going to focus on how to speak clearly in English using words stress correctly. This is one of the most important parts of English pronunciation. Many of my students worry about speaking English clearly and they’re afraid that their accent makes it hard for other people to understand them. But most of the time the problem isn’t an accent. It’s word stress.

Importance Of Word Stress

Word stress is essential for sounding natural in English. It’s part of our natural rhythm. When we speak in this lesson today, you’re going to learn exactly what words stress is, how you can use it, and at the end, I’m going to share with you how to pronounce some of the most challenging words in English and be sure that you’re doing it correctly.

So let’s start with what exactly is word stress and why is it so important?

Word Stress Definition

Native speakers’ ears are trained to listen for very specific sounds, and if a sound in a word isn’t correct, if it’s not stressed in the right way, it means that either they don’t understand the word correctly or they don’t understand it at all. Now to understand words stress, there’s one thing you must know.

You have to know what a syllable is. All of our words have much smaller parts and these are called syllables. A word might have only one syllable like a dog, cat, walk, drive, desk. Even words like strengths or stretched have only one syllable. They’re longer words, but there are just one syllable.

Syllables

Syllables are all about the different sounds of a word, not the length of a word. And here is a great trick for knowing each syllable in a word, syllables are usually made up of one vowel sound and our chin drops every time you use a syllable.

I want you to do something with me. I want you to put your hand under your chin and I want you to say the word dog. Dog. Do you notice that your chin moves down one time when you say the word dog? That’s because there’s only one syllable. Let’s try another one. Again, I want you to put your hand under your chin and this time I want you to say the word identification.

If we slow this word way down, I want you to count how many syllables are i-den-ti-fi-ca-tion. What do you feel? How many times did you feel your chin moved down? The number should be six and that is a syllable every time your chin moves with one of those vowel sounds, it is a part of a word, a syllable. Now that you know what syllables are all about, let’s go back and talk about why these are so important for word stress.

In English, we do not stress every syllable in a word. Instead, we stress one syllable. Let me show you the difference. Identification. I-den-ti-fi-ca-tion. Do you notice that stress? My voice goes up. It’s louder and it’s clear when I say -ca. If I stressed every syllable equally, it would sound like this:i-den-ti-fi-cation. For example, I need your identification.

That doesn’t sound natural at all because it isn’t natural. We do not stress every syllable in a word. Let’s try another example. I’m going to listen to a record today in that sentence, I’m using the record as a noun, but this word could also be a verb and in that case, I need to change which syllable I stress. For example, I’m going to record some music today. Record the syllable.

Stress has changed and as a result, native speakers immediately recognize it as a verb. Several words in English can be both nouns and verbs, but we have to be careful about how we say them. We have to change which syllable we stress, and I’m going to share the most important ones with you in a moment. Now that you know what word stress is and why it’s important, it’s time to figure out which syllable should you stress in a word. And there are a few ways that you can do that and here’s where I’m going to give you a really helpful trick for those long scary words in English.

The tricks for Stressing long scary Words

The first thing that you can do is listen to native speakers carefully and see if you can hear which syllable is stressed in a word. The next thing that you can do is you could use a dictionary to help you as well. In a dictionary, you’ll always find the phonetic spelling of a word and there is an apostrophe before the stressed syllable.

So if we look at the word refrigerator, we can see that there’s an apostrophe just before fridge refrigerator. Now the truth is, you don’t always have time to look in a dictionary and sometimes even if you’relistening carefully, it’s hard to identify which syllable a native speaker stresses. So I’ve got three tricks to help you.

Number 1

For most nouns and adjectives that, have two syllables, you will stress the first syllable. Let’s look at some examples. Climate, parent, knowledge, flippant, spacious, basic, object. If you noticed in each of those examples, I said the first syllable louder, longer, higher and clear, and a great way for you to practice is simply listening to me say those and immediately repeat what you hear. After you do that. Let’s move on.

Number 2

We just talked about nouns and adjectives with two syllables, but now let’s talk about verbs with two syllables. Most of the time with verbs that have two syllables, you’re going to stress the second syllable. Let’s look at some examples. Become, embrace, reflect, forgive, adore, object. Did you notice that last one? An object is a noun, to object is a verb and we’ve switched which syllable gets stressed. An object, to object.

This is exactly like that example of record and a record that we talked about earlier, so let’s look at a few more examples of words that could be verbs or nouns and how we need to change the stress on an increase to increase, decrease to decrease, a refund to refund, an invite to invite, a project to project. Again, I want you to practice by listening to those and repeating what you hear. It’s a great way to develop that pattern and become more familiar, more comfortable with word stress.

Number 3

The third and final rule today, which is how to identify which syllable to stress and long words like I’m going to say each of these words out loud and I want you to listen carefully to see if you notice any patterns with these words. Administration, exploitation,communication, interruption,accusation, intervention,abbreviation,extension incomprehension.

All right? What did you notice? Did you find a pattern of which syllable I said louder, longer, higher and clear? Do you notice that all of these words end with the sound -tion/-sion: incomprehension, administration, exploitation interruption? They all have the -tion/-sponsored and if you listen carefully, I’m stressing the syllable just before -tion/-soon.Listen carefully. Administration, interruption communication, exploitation in comprehension, stressing the right syllable, and those longer words will ensure that you’re communicating much more clearly and that you sound more natural in English.

Word Stress Test

Now I’m going to test you. I want you to choose the word from this list. Create a sentence, share your sentence with me in the comments below, but I want you to tell me which syllable in that word that you should stress. Now, if you found this post helpful to you, be sure to give it a thumbs up,

share it with friends, and be sure to subscribe to this blog so that you never miss a future confident English lesson.I’ve also got a playlist available for you with additional lessons on how to sound more natural and speak clearly in English. With that, thank you so much for joining me. Have a wonderful week and I’ll see you next time for your Confident English lesson.

Continue Reading

General Literature

Javier Marías – A Heart So White

Published

on

Javier marías – a heart so white

One of Spain’s best writer today by drumroll please none other than Roberto bolaño my favorite authors Javier Matias is a very famous Spanish author and translator who published his first novel at 19. Javier’s father was a Spanish author and philosopher Julio Matias who was a student of Ortega y Gasset at one point his father was imprisoned for a little bit and then banned for teaching after opposing Franco Matias, who wrote a story called The life and death of Marcelino.

Javier marías – a heart so white

Javier marías – a heart so white

This was included in a collection of his stories called while the women are sleeping and he wrote on that particular story when he was 14. This is the first novel by him that I’ve read and I think it’s superb. I mean it’s marvelous it’s something to marvel at that just in its elegance and sophistication and its style it is really he’s just got Pedro almodóvar would have done a magnificent adaptation.I mean straight arrangements you know that whole tone of the skin I live in it would be.

A heart so white

Published in 1992 is about a man his wife his father and his father’s previous wives, it’s an elegant sophisticated Spanish philosophical of mystery.

A man is haunted by the actions of his father so not his past necessarily but his father’s past Javier Melia’s is a Spanish author and translate who was born in Madrid but also spent a little bit of time over here in this states. Vakious is an enviable astute writer the title a heart so white is referencing a line from Shakespeare’s Macbeth which I’m afraid I haven’t yet read I know my hands are of your colour but I shamed to wear a heart so white which was said by Lady Macbeth to make that after he has committed murder, his hands are red with blood the main character of the novel is a translator elect Matthias, he knows more than anyone that you can’t unhear something after it’s said you can’t forget something after it’s said and sometimes it may be better if nothing was said so how much should be really told shouldn’t we tell the truth if it’s just going to hurt somebody how much does it actually help to know the truth and since memory is fallible what is the truth really?

The book opens with a family gathering, I think it’s like lunch or something and this woman gets up from the table walks into the bathroom takes out a gun and shoots herself in the heart committing suicide the opening of the book is one of the most masterfully crafted introductions into a sombre expansive gorgeous meditation on life love marriage secrets impermanence death and the inescapable consequences of past actions, the woman who killed herself is the second wife of the narrator’s father Ron’s. A man with a shadowy past kind of a dandy works in the art world worked at one time for the Prado in Madrid, but yeah he has a shadowing past is kind of sketchy as we discover that she is actually the second of his wives to have died, his son the narrator the protagonists grew up thinking that she was the only one, the first it’s that classic question is it better to tell the truth or will that just do more harm so for better or worse semi intentionally yet also sort of unintentionally.

He embarks on a journey to learn more to discover what really happened along with his wife I just don’t want to tell you what happens of course you know because it just builds up to it magnificently you know it just builds and builds and builds and then it hits and it’s just you know he seems to just have it like in his blood this developed sense a narrative you know I don’t know what it is I don’t know if it’s like the past brilliant authors working through him or something you know I mean he seemed so well-read and also he has that quality of authors who are no longer around he has that intelligence and maturity of authors from the past ol older authors you know it’s like something that I never come across but I also don’t read a lot of modern authors so this again yeah do that but I’ve known he’s got like this is deep these deep roots some sort of where is just a genius maybe it was what it is money has frequently uses repetition to connect the thoughts ideas and situations in this man’s life it’s like something happens and then there’s this mental or philosophical kind of meandering or dig up the digression you know sort of gets lost in thought and some anecdotes are brought up and then we kind of come back to the narrative but then we go off again it’s like taking cigarette breaks in the middle of the novel to kind of like drifted the thought but you’re traveling along with her you know maybe that was probably actually occurring well he wrote this he smokes a lot I think he like didn’t go to a talk at Oxford because he he would have to step outside and smoke or something like that I mean I think he spent some time at Oxford so it’s not like a huge deal that’s sort of funny that he passed on it because he wanted to smoke when he wanted to smoke and where he wanted to I can respect that ambiguity is also a recurring theme the idea that no matter the choices made the result eventually is the same whether you do or don’t do something you know the fear of missing out just sort of inconsequential on a long enough timeline at the end of a life or history or time.

Everything is nullified what happens becomes equivalent to what didn’t I know he’s a fan of Thomas Bernhard and you can you can tell after reading passages like this one which I enjoyed a lot Thomas Barnard I’m gonna read something else by him he’s funny sometimes I have the feeling that nothing that happened is habitants because nothing happens without interruption nothing lasts orders or a ceaselessly remembered and even the most monotonous and routine of existences by its apparent repetitiveness gradually cancels itself out negates itself until nothing is anything and no one is anyone they were before and the week wheel of the world is pushed along by forgetful beings who hear and see and know what has not said never happens is unknowable and unverifiable what takes place is identical to what doesn’t take place what we dismiss are allowed to slip bias is identical to what we accept and sees what we experience identical to what we never try and yet we spend our lives in a process of choosing and rejecting and selecting and drawing a line to separate those identical things and make of our story in a unique story that we can remember and that can be told we pour all our intelligence and our feelings and our enthusiasm into the task of discriminating between things that will all be made equal if they haven’t already bitten and that’s why we’re so full of regrets and lost opportunities of confirmations and reaffirmation and opportunities grasped when the truth is that nothing is affirmed, and everything is constantly in the process of being lost or perhaps there never was anything the word nihilism seems so cheap and dusty to describe the stance taken by matthias because for all the sadness and tragedy and maybe cynicism and negativity or pessimism found within that passage somehow matthias never comes off as such you know as cynical or negative or not nihilistic somehow despite writing things such as that he communicates the fascinating mysterious profound beauty of life the possibilities but also the guarantee of the inevitable collapse of everything but it’s more of a beautiful drift into an immense unknown that has suggested that’s much of what life seems like in his novels this beautiful drift into an immense unknown memory is fallible but fiction is definitive

He’s great he reminds me of he has a little bit of the demeanor of Jorge Mele bar-kays but regarding fiction you know it’s funny because you’re saying something you’re writing something that didn’t happen but definitively and that’s the way it is unquestionably because he wrote it that way that’s how it was written whereas in real life sure you could say something happened a certain way but are we really certain that’s how it happened now because everybody can refute it you know everybody can challenge that you know that’s not how it happened.

Nadia says one of the reasons we write and read novels and fiction in general is that it can’t be denied by anyone it’s interesting because you have that kind of like foundation when you write fiction you have this structure muddiness has never been married yet so much of the novel focuses on what happens when you’re married both positive and negative his ideas on the subject are fascinating I mean really for not having been married himself he’s very you know he’s very observant it’s eerily so you know Matias has never married but he often writes about the institution in his fiction usually as a crucible for his favorite conflicting themes our need to share confidences and the perils of saying too much that was from The New Yorker so much in the book is wrapped up in the idea of language of the Train ideas that can’t be ignored Mateus said I’ve never been interested in what some people called naturalism or some people call realism. I don’t worry very much about something that occasionally hasn’t been pointed out to me as a possible flaw, many of the narrators and characters speak in a very similar way even in dialogue. I’m not interested in using differentiated voices not even in dialogue it must be believable but that’s all I think on the contrary that it is a courtesy on the part of the author to give the reader something which is interesting and if possible intelligent I can’t bear very much the kind of dialogue you often find in many novels in which two non intelligent people are saying not intelligent things four pages on end.

So for an example of intelligent people saying intelligent things in hearts of white one of the greatest scenes in the book the scene the scene where I really realized I was reading a master is where the narrator mistranslates the words spoken by two politicians in front of the woman who has not yet his wife doing so intentionally to see how she’ll react so this is a set up you know he’s a high profile translator and so he’s at this event with these two politicians speaking to one another and I think they’re based off of I read it somewhere I think I’m not quite sure I think they’re based off of Margaret Thatcher and Felipe Gonzalez but I’m not I’m not certain but this woman comes in – well he’s an interpreter excuse me he’s and he’s interpreting so he’s saying he’s translating the words and speaking them aloud as they’re talking to one another so they can understand each other and this woman this translator comes in his future wife to verify that what he is saying is accurate to keep an eye on him you know if he if he messes up she’s supposed to say something she’s supposed to call him on it that’s her job so she’s sitting by him and he’s doing his job but he starts miss translating the dialogue that these two politicians are having to make it more interesting and he starts off kind of small at first but then he like ramps up and then he just like goes to town he starts just like putting these very interesting philosophical ideas in their conversation and but so they both think that they’re actually having this really profound dialogue you know and it’s it’s terrific it’s sort of an act of I mean it’s he’s kind of coming on to her right he is because she doesn’t stop it it’s an extremely romantic scene it’s also very funny.

I mean it’s just so brilliant scene suddenly what would be drive small talk takes on profound significance as he orchestrates this intelligent conversation between these two politicians though it’s his future wife’s job to immediately correct him she doesn’t and this risky intimate action begins their relationship everything ties together but it’s not as if he had it all planned out in the beginning on the contrary you can feel the sense of discovery for the narrator and you know for you the reader but it seems to have been that way for him as well when he was writing the novel you know he’s writing to find out what happens we’re piecing the mystery together along with the author discovering the patterns and connections in the mystery of life but just like the character as well as us.

I imagine the author is left with far more questions and answers because just as in life nothing is resolved it might be the call to prayer so I moved to a Muslim neighborhood Muslim and polish neighborhood so the bells you heard earlier are from a Catholic polish cathedral and that would be the call to prayer so I hear both I love my neighborhood better than food it’s a hell of a book so who should read it anyone who enjoys for Hezbollah no Juan Rulfo Faulkner and in finally Shakespeare who I have not read enough of pick this one up it’s astoundingly beautiful it’s one of my absolute favorite books of all time better than food if there’s anything I mean it’s better than everything I mean it is a magnificent book I absolutely loved it. If you enjoyed this please subscribe if you haven’t already .

I hope this made your day better take care and I’ll talk to you soon have a good day.

Continue Reading

General Literature

what is concord? Subject-Verb Agreement (Rules and Examples)

Published

on

What is concord? subject-verb agreement (rules and examples)

what is concord?

What is concord? subject-verb agreement (rules and examples)

The word concord is derived from the Latin for agreement. ‘concord’ in everyday speech, it means ‘agreement or harmony between people or groups’
In grammar, concord refers to the way that a word has a form appropriate to the number or gender of the noun or pronoun it relates to. For example, in ‘She hates it’, there is concord between the singular form of the verb and the singular pronoun ‘she’.

Some linguists use the terms concord and agreement interchangeably, although traditionally, concord is used about the proper relationship between adjectives and the nouns they modify, while agreement refers to the proper relationship between verbs and their subjects or objects.

There are many grammatical challenges that confront ESL learners on the issue of Concord and various questions arise on how to conform to the rules of grammaticality. Which type of subject goes with which type of verb? Is it possible to have a plural subject go with a singular verb? How does a plural verb look like? Does a collective noun take a singular or plural verb? If two entities refer to one and the same person, do we use a singular or plural verb?

Subject-Verb Concord

Subject-verb concord is when the subject of a sentence and the verb of a sentence agree i.e when they have the same number and person. Here, if the subject of the sentence is singular, the verb must also be singular. If the subject is plural, the verb must be plural as well.

Rules of Subject-Verb Agreement

1. A singular subject requires a singular verb. Look at these examples:

  • The committee meets here every Thursday. (singular)
  • The crowd is getting angry. (singular)
  • The jury has finally reached a decision. (singular)
  • He does this regularly. (singular)
  • The girl loves to sing. (singular)
  • The list of items is on the desk. (singular)

2. A plural subject requires a plural verb. Examine these examples:

  • Basketballs roll across the floor.
  • These clothes are too small for me.
  • Dollar bills were scattered on the floor.

Meanwhile, some plural subjects call for singular verbs:

  • Fifty dollars is too much to pay for that dress.
  • Twenty seconds is all you get before I scream.

3. A compound singular subject takes plural verb as illustrated in the following sentences:

  • Sugar and flour are needed for the recipe.
  • Neither my dad nor my brothers know how to ski.
  • Pepperoni and cheese are great on a pizza.
  • Corned beef and cabbage is a traditional meal in Ireland. (popular usage)
  • The creator and producer is arriving soon. (both refer to the same person)

4. Compound plural subjects take plural verb as illustrated in the sentences below:

  • Dolphins and elephants are highly intelligent creatures.
  • Eating, sleeping, and reading are enjoyable activities.
  • Both men and women enjoy yoga.
  • Chocolate and strawberry are my two favourite flavours of ice cream.
  • Furniture and paper are two uses for wood.
  • Roses, gardenias, and jonquils bloom in Beatrice’s garden.

However, there are unusual cases to some of these patterns when it comes to the subject-verb agreement. Let us study some of these exclusions:

Exclusion 1

When any of these words: with, along with, together with, as well as, in addition to, including, no less than, etc. joins a compound subject, the form of the verb is singular. That is, when we replace ‘and’ in Pattern 4 with any of the words listed above, the appropriate verb form is singular. See the following examples:

  • The man with his wife is here.
  • The boy together with his sister is attending the party.
  • The husband, as well as his wife, was arrested.
  • The goat in addition to the cow has disappeared.
  • The goalkeeper no less than the defenders is to blame for the goal.

Exclusion 2

When a compound subject joined by ‘and’ gives the impression of a unit or when the two singular subjects refer to the same person or thing, we use the singular verb as we have in the following:

  • Bread and butter is his favourite meal.
  • His wife and greatest admirer gives him sound counsel.
  • Paul’s friend and boss is very pleasant.
  • The President and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces has arrived.
  • Rice and beans is good for lunch.

Exclusion 3

When we connect a compound subject (two or more singular subjects) with any of these words, or, either…or, neither…nor, not, but, not only, but also, we use the singular verb. Look at the following examples:

  • John or Joe is going to the farm.
  • Either John or Joe is to blame.
  • Neither the boy nor the girl has a good report.
  • Not the husband but the wife was given the award.
  • Not only the teacher but also the student likes the beautiful building.

But when one of the subjects joined by any of the above items (the correlatives) differ in number; in other words, if one is singular and the other one is plural, the verb agrees in number with the nearer noun or subject. This is the principle of proximity. See the following examples:

  • Neither the thieves nor their leader was arrested.
  • Neither the leader nor the thieves were arrested.
  • Not only the boy but his friends were present at the game.

Exclusion 4

A singular subject followed by a plural modifier requires a singular verb. Examples

  • The reaction of the students was unexpected.
  • The leader of the armed bandits is to be convicted today.
  • A list of the successful applicants is out already.

Subject-Verb Agreement: collective nouns

We often use singular nouns that refer to groups of people (for example: team, government, committee) as if they were plural. This is because we often think of the group as people, doing things that people do (eating, wanting, feeling etc). In such cases, we use a plural verb. (We also then need to make sure that other words agree – they instead of it, who instead of which.)

Singular:

  • The new company is the result of a merger.
  • An average family consists of four people.
  • The committeewhich was formed in 2012, is made up of four men and four women.

Plural:

  • The committee have asked for sandwiches for lunch. They have to leave early.
  • My familywho do not see me often, have asked me home for Christmas.
  • The team hope to win next time.

However, persistence is important in the use of the accompanying pronoun referents such as it or them.

Exception

Collective nouns followed by ‘of’ and a plural noun in such phrases as a collection of paintings, a pride of lions, a flock of sheep, etc. take a singular verb in Standard English. Examples include:

  • A flock of lamb is in the garden.
  • A collection of paintings is up for auction tomorrow.
  • Do you know that a case of tools has gone missing from the hospital?
  • A host of angelic voices sings regularly in the concert.
  • A swarm of bees is difficult to control.

Similarly the phrase ‘one of’ plus a plural noun such as teachers, babies, children, carpenters, etc. takes a singular verb. Examples include:

  • One of the instructors likes rice and beans.
  • You can call him that one of the girls is here.
  • One of the children does not like biscuits.

Indefinite Pronouns

Indefinite pronouns such as each, every, everybody, anyone, nobody, no one, none, etc. take a singular verb.

Examples:

  • Somebody ate my sandwich!
  • Everyone says she is beautiful inside and out.
  • No one wants to hear about my health problems.
  • Either choice has its advantages.

Auxiliary Verbs

Auxiliary (or Helping) verbs are used together with a main verb to show the verb’s tense or to form a negative or question. The most common auxiliary verbs are have, be, and do.

  • Does Sam write all his own reports?
  • The secretaries haven’t written all the letters yet.
  • Terry is writing an e-mail to a client at the moment.

Numerals or Plural Numbers

Plural numbers take a singular verb when we use them in a phrase to indicate a sum or a unit.

Examples include:

  • Four years is the tenure of the president.
  • Five million naira is a great deal of money to carry around.
  • eight percent is good interest.
  • Forty hours is the normal work week in Nigeria.
  • Fifteen minutes is enough for a coffee break.

Conventional Plural Words

Some nouns which are plural in form but singular in meaning take a singular verb. Examples of such words include: news, measles, mumps, calculus, rickets, billiards, molasses, dizziness, semantics, trousers, scissors, etc.

Consider the following sentences in which we have such manifestations:

  • No news is good news.
  • Phonetics is an interesting subject.
  • His whereabouts is a secret.
  • Statistics is not my favorite subject.
  • Mathematics is a technical subject.

Pronoun/Antecedent Agreement

A pronoun must agree in number, gender, and case with its antecedent. What this statement means is that:

  1. A pronoun replacing a noun must agree in number as the noun it replaces.
  1. A pronoun replacing a noun must be masculine if the noun is masculine; feminine if the noun is feminine and neuter if the noun is neuter.
  1. A subject pronoun replaces a subject noun while an objective pronoun replaces a noun in the objective case too.

Let us expatiate on the positions above with illustrative examples:

With number:

  • The teacher told the girl to write her
  • The judges delivered their judgment this morning.
  • The man stood his ground even though he was wrong.

With gender:

  • The lady sang so well that the audience gave her a standing ovation.
  • My father is so strict that we did not dare to disobey him.
  • When an old woman speaks, we should listen to her.
  • The economy is not so buoyant, it needs urgent attention.

With case:

  • The boys arrived last night, they did not come with their
  • John called the girlhe asked her to stay at home.
  • The lady works in Lagos, she comes to Ondo every weekend.

Shifts in Construction

Apart from drowning yourself in what is Concord, you also need to know that there must be no shifts at all in your grammatical constructions, especially when you are expressing a single idea.

In other words, what I am saying is that your sentences must be the same in person, number, voice, and tense; that is, there must be agreement or concord in your sentences in terms of person, number, voice, and tense.

Do not shift from one person to the other

Look at the following:

  • *When you are confused, one doesn’t know what to do. (Incorrect)
  • When you are confused, you don’t know what to do. (Correct)
  •  We love the harvest months because we have a lot to eat. (Correct)
  • *They love the harvest months because we have a lot to eat. (Incorrect)
  • *For one to pass that course, I must study diligently. (Incorrect)
  • For me to pass that course, I must study diligently. (Correct)

 Do not shift from one voice to another

See the following:

  • *They praised the girl, but the boy was punished.
  • *The course leader rushed into the classroom, looked around and was seated.
  • *The driver was arrested but they released the passengers.

See correct way to render these sentences:

  • They praised the girl but punished the boy. (Active voice)
  • The course leader rushed into the classroom, looked around and sat. (Active voice)
  • The driver was arrested but the passengers were released. (Passive voice)

Do not shift from one tense to another

See the following constructions:

  • *He pressed the doorbell but there is no answer.
  • *The man gave the girl some money, but she does not thank him.

The correct forms of these sentences are:

  •  He pressed the doorbell but there was no answer.
  • The man gave the girl some money, but she did not thank him.

I hope you find this post on what is concord? enlightening. enjoy and share…

Continue Reading

Trending